Because I rarely read music reviews and have little
knowledge of music theory, I am going to do these reviews in my own… “special”
style. Mainly, I am going to go over each album, writing a paragraph or two
about each song and how it holds up both by itself and in the context of the
album as a whole. I will then do a quick conclusions/wrap-up deal at the end.
Okay? Okay.
One of my favorite bands of all time is the English
heavy metal band, Iron Maiden. They
were a key player in the New Wave of British Heavy Metal (NWOBHM) in the 70’s
and early 80’s, they were one of the single greatest bands of the 80’s, they
have a massive fanbase that spans multiple continents, and are, arguably, one
of the greatest heavy metal bands of all time. Their legacy is far reaching and
much of their music is generally considered some of the best heavy metal one
can find. Most fans tend to only listen to the run of Bruce Dickinson (the lead
singer for most of the band’s albums) and tend to shun everything else. And
while Dickinson’s run with the band is considered their highpoint, the band has
had other singers, 2 of which contributed to studio albums. The first is Blaze
Bayley, the singer who replaced Dickinson for two albums during the 90’s when
Dickinson left to pursue other interests, and who is routinely ignored or
shunned by fans (for good reason). The second is Paul di’Anno, the singer for
the band’s first two albums, the eponymous debut “Iron Maiden” and its
follow-up “Killers”. How do these albums stand up? Do they deserve a place
alongside classics like “Piece of Mind” or “Powerslave”? Or should they be put
alongside the band’s crappiest albums, like “No Prayer for the Dying” and “Virtual
XI”?
Iron
Maiden:
Prowler:
This is probably my favorite song on the entire
album. As such, it is a very strong start to the album. The song is
blisteringly fast, rushing along at a breakneck pace from start to finish. It
only ever slows down for a second or two at a time and those times when it does
are right before launching into more speedy riffs. The entire song feels like
going on a roller coaster; starting out with a (relatively) slow build-up, then
immediately launches into a blisteringly fast riff. These moments are repeated
over and over during the song and are great fun to listen too.
Paul di’Anno has some good vocals here too,
combining the rough sound of Brian Johnson with the deeper-pitched voice of
David Lee Roth. The lyrics are not too shabby either. While the song has no
real “meat”, so to speak (it provides no unique insights or statements; it is
simply the sordid tale of a man stalking women through the streets), the lyrics
are catchy and fun. The way that di’Anno elongates the end of a few key verses
(in addition to the clever use of backing vocals on those same lyrics) also
helps to make the song much more engaging. It sets those verses apart from the
others and the subtle change in sound helps to attract the listener’s attention
and draw them in.
Sanctuary:
This is another solid song. It is fairly notable for
the fact that it makes the jump from the heavy metal sound of Prowler to a more
hard-rock sound, in the style of Bon Scott era AC/DC. The lyrics are solid, but
nothing special. The chorus is quite catchy and memorable, and can become quite
an ear-worm if one lets it. Nothing much else to say about this one. Solid, but
nothing too special.
Remember Tomorrow:
Now, this is something entirely different. Avoiding
the hard rock and heavy metal sound of the previous tracks, this song goes for
a more prog-rock feel. The entire song lacks any choruses and has only 12
verses. It is also marked by a direct change of tone on every fourth verse, and
switches into a fast guitar solo right in the middle. It really is a wholly
unique sound compared to the rest of the songs. It actually does not feel like
it would be out of place on a Yes or Led Zepplin album, which is good or bad,
depending on one’s taste for progressive rock. It actually reminds me quite a
bit of a later song by the band, Children of the Damned, what with tonal
change; the long, protracted wails; the prog-e feel; and the guitar solo
partway through the song. Not that that is a bad thing, since both have their
merits.
The song also shows off di’Anno’s great range. He
transitions from relatively normal, clean vocals to high pitched, prolonged
wails very easily, cleanly, and smoothly. It is quite impressive and really
adds to the enjoyment of the song.
Running Free:
This song marks a transition back to a more…
traditional rock and metal sound. The entire song is carried by a strong
central riff, with di’Anno’s vocals perfectly accentuating the guitar playing.
His singing both merges seamlessly with, and enhances, the strong central riff,
and it makes the song very enjoyable to listen too.
Phantom of the Opera:
This is longest song on the entire album, clocking
in at a solid 2 to 3 minutes longer than all of the others. It is also probably
the most ambitious song on the album, featuring numerous tonal shifts, a
complicated lyrical structure (with no choruses), multiple solos (sometimes one
right after another), a lengthy instrumental section smack dab in the middle,
and lyrics based on a classic piece of literature. Unfortunately, it does not
all work. Di’Anno’s vocals really don’t work for this song (some lines sound
forced and strained to fit the sound of the instrumentation) and the way he
sings some lines makes them impossible to understand without a sheet of lyrics
handy. Still, it is not all bad. The instrumental sections are fantastic, with
a great interplay between the lead and rhythm guitar, the bass, and the drums.
It also features some really strong riffs and solos. The song is worth
listening too for those sections alone, and those who enjoy lengthy prog
adaptions of classic lit (or just prog in general) might find this interesting.
Transylvania:
This is Iron Maiden’s first instrumental and is
still one of their strongest. There are a number of impressive, fun solos
contained here and the instrumentation is top-notch. The interplay and
transition between different solos sounds great and the song features a number
of complicated pieces that are ear-shatteringly fast. What more is there to
say? It is a fantastic instrumental, through and through.
Strange World:
This is a very different song compared to most of
the previous. It is slower paced, features clean vocals, and feels much more
contemplative and introspective. It does feature some solos, but these are much
slower than previous. It sounds more like a classic Pink Floyd or The Who song
than a classic Iron Maiden one. Nonetheless, it works and it works quite well.
The vocals mesh well with the instrumentation, the solos are still interesting,
each part transitions well into the other, and the lyrics paint an interesting
picture of a Dunsany-style fantasy paradise.
Charlotte the Harlot:
This song is another solid addition to the album. It
features a strong central beat and a catchy chorus, both of which make the song
very enjoyable to listen to. Still, that does not mean the song is afraid to
mix things up. Partway through the song things slow down and the entire thing
takes on a slightly more tragic air, fitting of the lyrics. The song is
basically about a man who is in love with a hooker that does not reciprocate
his love. He is jealous of her clientele and wonders why she won’t pay
attention to him. It is probably one of the more interesting concepts for a
heartbreak song that I have heard and it works pretty well, all things told.
Iron Maiden:
This is another more traditional song, and it does
not really have that much going for it. The vocals are okay, but supremely
uninteresting. The instrumentation is solid all around, but again, not
particularly interesting. The lyrics don’t really do anything new or different.
The entire song is just kind of bland. Not really bad, but not really good
either. Just kind of boring when compared to all the other interesting,
different songs on the album.
Conclusion:
This album is a very solid hard-rock/heavy metal
album. It features a number of good songs, a couple great songs, some great
instrumentation, and solid vocals. Despite containing some boring songs, there
is a lot to like on this album for fans of classic rock or metal. It is also
interesting to see the roots of one of the most famous heavy metal bands in the
world. I recommend checking it out.
Final Rating: B+/10
Killers:
The Ides of March:
The second album starts off with a really short (as
in less than 2 minutes) instrumental piece. It sounds nice and has that
“galloping” sound Iron Maiden can do so well (and indeed, became known for on
later albums), but it is nothing special. Still, it is decent and a solid start
to the album.
Wrathchild:
Here is where things really start kicking. This song
is short (around 3 minutes), but sweet. Di’Anno’s typically rough vocal style
really shines here and he does a great job with the lyrics. He even gets to
show off his range, with a well-placed yell in the middle of the song really
showing how high he can get. The chorus is catchy as hell and really digs into
one’s brain. The riff is strong and fast, and makes a subtle use of the
“galloping” sound to draw the listener further into the song. All in all, it is
a great song and serves as a good introduction to band’s new focus on a more pure
heavy metal sound over the slightly prog-rock feel of the first album.
Murders in the Rue Morgue:
This song starts out slow, but slowly builds up over
the course of a minute to a blisteringly fast riff that caries the song for the
rest of its runtime. This song, like Phantom of the Opera, is based on a piece
of classic lit. That is not to say it has a similar structure or feel to
Phantom. In fact, it abandons the prog-rock feel of Phantom for a more traditional
heavy metal, Judas Priest inspired
sound. The song itself features a catchy chorus and fast instrumentation with
strong vocals to match. Di’Anno belts out each verse incredibly fast. It
actually bears resemblance to Steven Tyler’s vocals in Walk This Way, with
both being sung at about the same speed. And, again as with Walk This Way, it
is highly impressive and engaging to hear a singer sing that fast while still
being able to pronounce every verse correctly and in tune with the music.
Overall, a pretty strong song.
Another Life:
This is a relatively simple song. It only has 8
verses that are repeated multiple times throughout the song. What instrumental
sections there are work, but are nothing too fancy. It is just a fairly
nondescript, plain song. Nothing really that special.
Genghis Khan:
This is the second instrumental of the album and it
is by far the stronger of the two. It has a nice beat, and the solos and riffs
flow into each other nicely. What is especially nice is the aural soundscape in
creates, especially in the later part of the song. The song starts out fine
enough, with good solos and instrumentals creating a slow build-up throughout
most of the song. Then suddenly near the end wailing guitars come in and
totally change the tone of the entire song and it becomes significantly slower,
but none less interesting. The progression of the music seems like saddling up
one’s horse in a base camp than riding out across some blasted tundra, the
rushing wind in one’s ears. It really is quite an interesting, underrated piece
that needs to be heard more.
Innocent Exile:
To be perfectly honest, this is a fairly generic
song. It once again talks about running from the law, a theme all too common in
much of Iron Maiden’s early work. The instrumentation is okay, but extremely
bland and uninteresting. Sure, it is not incompetent, but it is just so samey and
boring when compared to every other
song from the era that it becomes supremely uninteresting and, dare I say, bad.
Or maybe just lazy, but that is still not a point in the song’s favor.
Killers:
This is a great damn song. It really, really is. It
has lovely instrumentation, allows di’Anno to stretch his vocals (especially in
the beginning), it provides a strong central riff, and it has a great sense of
style about it. The entire song is basically about a serial killer stalking and
killing his victims. This song sounds dark, but the entire thing is played up
so it is so over the top and ridiculous, it becomes hard not to like. Di’Anno
just makes the killer of the song sound so damn crazy and gleeful that it
appeals to that small part of our brain that enjoys crazy psychopathic killers.
He just sounds like he is having so much fun that it is hard not to get some
enjoyment from listening to the song. And there really is nothing wrong with
that.
Prodigal Son:
This is a fairly slow song when compared to the rest
of the album. While this is sometimes good (because it can spice up an album,
adding a little bit of extra flavor), the song itself has to be at least
interesting for that to work. Unfortunately, this does not have that going for
it. The entire thing is really quite boring and provides nothing interesting to
latch onto. The vocals are bland, the instrumentation is bland, and the lyrics
are bland; the entire thing is just extremely forgettable. I have actually sat
through this song multiple times without realizing I sat through it until
something more interesting came up. It does not stay in my memory long enough
to even realize I listened to it. If I go away for 5 minutes without thinking
about it, I will completely forget what it sounds like. That does not happen
with most other songs, even the ones I absolutely despise. Really, the entire
is just a flavorless piece of nothing and holds no real value.
Purgatory:
This is certainly an improvement over the horribly
dull Prodigal Son, but it is not without its problems. Namely, it too is
generic. The instrumentation is pretty decent and has a good pace, but still
fairly generic when compared to more memorable pieces. Really, the best part of
the song is the chorus. It has a great sound about it, sometimes dipping into
wailing territory, but never too much as to be mistaken as black metal. Beyond
that, there is nothing really memorable or interesting about this song that has
not been done better in multiple other songs on the album.
Twilight Zone:
This is one of my favorite songs on the entire
album. While it is quite short, there is still a lot to like packed into its 3
minute length. It has a great beat that integrates perfectly with the vocals.
This actually has the side effect of making the beat much more noticeable and
enjoyable. The song uses some subtle backing vocals in the chorus to make it
sound slightly otherworldly, which goes perfectly with the lyrics. The lyrics
themselves describe a tragic tale of longing, describing a ghost haunting his
lover. He wants to be with them, but they cannot see or hear him, no matter how
hard he tries. It is all well written and works very well with the
instrumentation and di’Anno’s vocals, who helps to create creating an
atmosphere of sadness and longing about the song with his perfectly timed
wails.
Drifter:
I will say one thing: this song does do some
interesting thing with tonal shifts. Not much else going for it, though. There
are parts in the song where the tone switches briefly from fast and furious
rock ‘n roll to a much slower, introspective sound. This usually occurs right
after the chorus and creates an interesting disconnect between the end of the
chorus and regular verses. Beyond that though, the song does not have much to
offer at all. The instrumentation is boring, the vocals are boring, and the lyrics
are boring. It is just really uninteresting (aside from the neat tonal) and a
pretty disappointing end to the album.
Conclusion:
“Killers” has a lot of great songs. Unfortunately,
it also has a number of bland songs as well. The great songs are certainly
worth a listen, it is neat to hear the bands progression between albums, and it
is cool to see the start of some of the bands signature musical elements (like
the aforementioned “galloping”). But, whether or not it is worth the bland
songs that come with the good ones will be up to the listener. There really is
a lot of blandness here and it drags the album down. One might just be better off buying the good
stuff off of iTunes and abandoning the rest.
Final Rating: PBJ sammich/10
Breakfastman is an amateur reviewer,
student, and all around cool guy. Questions, comments, constructive criticisms,
rants, rages, or just want to tell me my taste in music sucks? All forms of
feedback are encouraged, so feel free. All images blatantly stolen from Google.
No comments:
Post a Comment